Convictions for Pimping & Pandering with Character Evidence

In sex cases, there is often evidence of a defendant’s prior behavior, such as text messages showing illegal sex crimes, that a prosecutor may seek to introduce to show motive or knowledge about the sex offense being charged.  The defense will argue against its introduction, saying such evidence is an attempt to show defendant has bad character and that evidence of prior acts is not admissible to show conduct at a later date.  How do judges rule on this issue?  For a summary of a reported case that tackled this issue, click on the following link.

http://www.greghillassociates.com/convictions-for-pimping-pandering-with-character-evidence.html.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s