Romero Motion Only Considers the Crime Committed, Not More

The following summary is one that anyone filing a Romero motion may want to cite to because it reverses a Pomona trial court for denying a Romero motion and is so doing, making inferences that were, the Second Appellate District Court commented, improper speculation. The opinion also reminds the reader that the court should consider the lapse of time since the prior strike and defendant’s employment history in the intervening time. To read a summary of this case, please click on the following link –

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s