What Are B.A.R.C. Online Animal Cruelty Courses?

Animal cruelty is a tough crime to defend. After all, most people are deeply sympathetic to suffering or pain that any animal such as a dog or cat may endure, as such animals are often a great source of personal comfort, affection or loyalty. So when one is facing such a charge, damage control is often a prime objective of the defense. Until recently, there were no online classes one could take to get a start on mitigating punishment. Now there are the B.A.R.C. online classes for animal cruelty. What is involved in such classes? To read about these classes, click on the following link.

https://www.greghillassociates.com/what-are-b-a-r-c-online-animal-cruelty-courses.html.

american-society-legal-advocates-top-100-2016-2

What Is Vacating a Conviction under Penal Code § 1473.7?

If someone if facing deportation or other adverse immigration consequences due to a prior conviction, that person or his attorney should look closely at Penal Code § 1473.7 and the circumstances of the plea leading to such immigration problems. Our office has now filed and had granted several motions to vacate a plea or conviction under Penal Code § 1473.7. It is a powerful, broadly written new law. To read more about 1473.7, click on the following link.

https://www.greghillassociates.com/what-is-vacating-a-conviction-under-penal-code-1473-7.html.

nacda-2017-nationally-ranked-top-ten-atty-award

Is SB 1393 Retroactive to Allow Resentencing, Less Time?

Senate Bill (SB) 1393 is not retroactive to allow someone in prison to request a lower sentence based on SB 1393’s provisions giving judges discretion to not impose a five-year enhancement for a prior conviction for a serious felony when defendant faces a sentencing on a serious felony. In other words, one cannot ask for resentencing on any sentence if the sentence is final. However, if the sentence is not final, SB 1393 would apply and the judge has discretion to keep or not impose such a five-year enhancement. To read more about SB 1393, please click on the following link.

https://www.greghillassociates.com/is-sb1393-retroactive-to-allow-resentencing-less-time.html.

american-jurist-institute-top-10-crim-law-atty-2017

 

Is Carrying a Loaded Gun a Crime of Moral Turpitude?

If one is unlawfully carrying a loaded gun for self-defense, i.e. one does not have a license to do so or a permit to do so, is such a crime a crime of moral turpitude that could cause immigration problems? Until the case of Francisco Bedolla, no court had ruled on this issue. How did the Sixth Appellate Court rule on this? To read a summary of the ruling, click on the following link.

https://www.greghillassociates.com/is-carrying-a-loaded-gun-a-crime-of-moral-turpitude.html/

best-attorney-lifetime-charter-member-rue-ratings

If Jurors Discuss Defendant Not Testifying, Prejudice?

There is very often a point in a criminal case where jurors think, “If defendant is innocent, why won’t he testify and just explain the truth?” Indeed, such a naïve trust in our judicial system is refreshing, but also underestimates the power of an experienced prosecutor to cross examine a defendant and impeach defendant. Therefore, most defense attorneys counsel their clients to remain silent at trial. If jurors discuss this refusal to testify, is this improper? If not, can it become improper at some point? To read more about this issue, click on the following link.

https://www.greghillassociates.com/if-jurors-discuss-defendant-not-testifying-prejudice.html.

AVVO-Rated-Attorney-2012-350-Dpi

Prop 57 Not Retroactive for Juvenile While Appealing?

Our office has received many phone calls and e-mail inquiries about appealing a conviction suffered by a juvenile for a case filed in adult court.  Proposition 57 has changed the law on how a criminal case against a juvenile must be filed.  Proposition 57, however, is not retroactive because it does not directly change punishment.  To read more about how Proposition 57 may still benefit someone who was convicted in adult court before Prop 57 was passed, click on the following link.

https://www.greghillassociates.com/prop-57-not-retroactive-for-juvenile-while-appealing.html.

National Trial Lawyers Top 100

 

What Is SB 1046 Regarding Ignition Interlock Devices?

For anyone who has suffered a DUI conviction in the past and/or lost an admin per se hearing at the DMV, having one’s drivers license suspended is a painful situation. One must resort to Uber, public transportation, carpooling, walking or biking instead of driving. One can lose a job or fall behind in school. Senate Bill (SB) 1046 attempts to strike a balance between the public policy of punishing DUI offenders without forcing unemployment. To read about this new law effective for those arrested for DUI on January 1, 2019 and after, click on the following link.

https://www.greghillassociates.com/what-is-sb-1046-regarding-ignition-interlock-devices.html.

Superlawyers-2017